An open letter to Christi Grimm, Inspector General of the HHS
Without a doubt, there is an enormous amount of corruption at the highest levels of the FDA, CDC, and NIH that needs to be investigated. In particular, they are hiding the safety signals.
Apr 4
1,081
639
Dear Inspector General Grimm,
There is overwhelming evidence of an enormous amount of corruption at the highest levels of the CDC, FDA, and NIH. These activities are aimed at both:
- deliberately suppressing any negative safety and efficacy data about the COVID vaccines
- suppressing safe, effective treatments using widely available repurposed drugs and supplements
- The CDC and FDA are deliberately ignoring their own safety data that shows that the vaccines are unsafe. The CDC knew in January 2021 that the vaccines were unsafe, but they said NOTHING. This is unacceptable.
- The CDC refuses to acknowledge that there are millions of vaccine injured people in America. The Israeli Ministry of Health did a survey on vaccine injuries and found that 4.5% of people who took the vaccine had neurological issues. I confirmed this same rate of injury with a local physician in my area with over 20,000 patients. Independently, we also know there were hundreds of thousands of vaccine injured people who joined groups on Facebook which Facebook deleted. Why would Facebook find it necessary to remove these groups? And how does the CDC explain the hundreds of thousands of people who joined these groups if the vaccines are safe and effective? The only explanation that fits the data is that the CDC is hiding the fact that the vaccines are unsafe and have injured millions of Americans, many of them permanently.
- over 90% of the last 30 cases she embalmed had telltale blood clots that have only been seen in vaccinated people and never seen prior to the COVID vaccinesThe CDC is deliberately putting the American public at risk.Clear clinical trial fraud is deliberately ignored by the FDA.Embalmer videos.this article.
- No cure for the millions of vaccine injured.They are ignoring the DMED data. The CDC is supposed to be monitoring the DMED data as well as other databases. The DMED data had safety signals as well that clearly showed the vaccines are unsafe. They were unambiguous. Why was there never any public report alerting the public about this?
- The public is not getting a proper informed consent briefing. The CDC, FDA, and NIH ignore most all email and phone communication attempting to hold them accountable. All attempts to alert responsible individuals at the CDC, the FDA, and their respective outside committees of the safety signals in VAERS were ignored. They simply delete the notifications. See this article as an example.
- Corruption and intimidation inside the CDC. CDC Whistleblower Scientist Given Huge Bonus and Asked to Rewrite Fraudulent Vaccine-Autism Study for details.
- Multiple systematic reviews and meta analyses of ivermectin and fluvoxamine are ignored by the NIH. These are the highest level of evidence in evidence-based medicine. This is the standard used by the medical community. How can they be ignored? See for example the April 6 JAMA studyneutral recommendationearlier key opinion leader panel more than a year ago recommended fluvoxamine as a patient option The rate of myocarditis is much higher than the CDC is telling people and they know it.All attempts by dozens of us to find answers to our questions about vaccine safety and efficacy were deflected. If there is an honest explanation for any of these observations for some reason nobody wants to share it with us. Not even for a million dollars. Instead, the White House has directed technology companies to censor us. The behavior is consistent with people who have something to hide.
- Inability to interpret science. Tony Fauci and the virus origin coverup:Your office can obtain the unredacted emails which will reveal the cover-up. Why would he do that if he had nothing to do with the virus?
- Early treatments that work are ignored by the NIHDavid Wiseman analyzed the results, he found that the results were statistically significantNegative data that is withheld: The Reuters story reveals that they have no credible explanation for the huge number of death reported into the VAERS systemit already takes into accountFacilitating the spread of misinformation. NIH Guidelines Panel corruption. There are undisclosed conflicts of interest on the CDC COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines panel. It appears this panel is not assessing the science objectively. Fluvoxamine is a perfect example.
Finally, I am happy to clarify and/or elaborate on any of these points. You know how to contact me.
Leave a comment: