On CognitiveType.Comat base, I fit SeFi (also known as SEE in Socionics, ESFP in MBTI, SeF in Jung).

Note: Auburn has recently updated his Se description and it's a lot closer to what I experience. This was initially my reaction to his original description but, now that he has gotten beyond that, you can take it as a reaction to the "MBTI" descriptions at large.


Myth #1: Se is Addicted to External Stimulation, Sensory Thrills and Pleasure, but Lacks any Internal World




Click image for larger version  Name:	sad4c.jpg Views:	10 Size:	111.7 KB ID:	1141





isimpairnowrunning away from the internal


Click image for larger version  Name:	channeling.jpg Views:	7 Size:	83.3 KB ID:	1142






presentengulfed






Click image for larger version  Name:	dancinginwater2.jpg Views:	8 Size:	79.4 KB ID:	1143






Click image for larger version  Name:	sunholding.jpg Views:	8 Size:	48.2 KB ID:	1144









Ti, not Se. When I asked other SeFi's about this, none of them were able to parse out the movements naturally either. There may be exceptions, but none that I've spoken to personally.

Click image for larger version  Name:	pianokid.jpg Views:	7 Size:	62.2 KB ID:	1145






I was known as a child prodigy in music, but lo and behold, I started practicing for hours each day at age four. Who knew that Pe leads could willfully set their mind to something and achieve it through dedication? Who knew they might interact with the environment in a way that might be deliberate


Myth #4: The Descriptions are Fair and Equal, Based on Data



realism and holeism