Myers Briggs Type Indicator Text analyzer

[Mahat]

Check this out. I don't know how the algorithm of this analyzer classifies the cognitive functions. I've since moved on from Memebti and have progressed to Cognitive Type (https://cognitivetype.com/).

[Mahat]

i've always found it easy to manipulate people's perceptions especially since people project what they want to see onto you and can't see beyond their own projections. Once you can see those mechanisms at play, you can direct the course of the interaction. The thing is, most people are blind to their own patterns and internal mechanisms and those are only really apprehended subconsciously. (unless they work on themselves or are particularly self-aware) if you can catch wind of those mechanisms before they do, it can be a powerful tool for manipulation in both good and insidious ways. There's an objective reality but most people don't perceive reality in an unmediated way. Even a realist will still apprehend reality with their own interpretational framework and what's salient to them. Some people have a better handle on this framework, and others not so much and it's the latter that are easy to manipulate. You can literally shape their reality for them.

On a somewhat related note, i rarely let people get to know me, not out of fear that they would uncover patterns i'm not privy to (in some ways i want to be unveiled), but mainly because i have this rich and complex inner world that's not readily translatable. So in that case, i'd rather be left alone to my own devices and wait for more perceptive people to catch on. Over the years, i've learned to wear to masks to occlude others from reaching into the core of who i am (whatever that may be) so most people only reach layer 1 of what's actually present and happening. In some ways, i wish i was more open and present with my feelings with other people and wore my identity on my sleeve. But that's not how i operate. I operate on smoke screens and layering, and i suppose a lot of people do but it's a matter of how privy they are to this. Point being, people only see what they want to see and can't (or refuse) to look beyond that.

intj
38%
infj
19%
isfp
11%
infp
8%
entp
7%
intp
4%
entj
4%
enfj
2%
enfp
2%
estj
2%
estp
1%
esfj
1%
istp
1%
esfp
0%
isfj
0%
istj
0%

sometimes i'm left speechless, not out of surprise but because the limits of language, especially the english language, can't quite capture the sublimity of certain moments. Language is a tool for narrative, logical, and dialectical ordering of experience, and some things are beyond categorizations. Some experiences tap into the pre-verbal and pre-conceptual part of our perception in that we can't do anything except take them as they are. It forces us to not experience ourselves as extended and mediated in time but rather to experience ourselves as pure being - being in the now, in flow with the thing or person we're experiencing. It's a paradoxical situation in that our world condenses and is distilled in that moment but at the same time it anagogically opens up the agent (you the subject) and arena (the environment) relationship through a novel experience of reality

intj
50%
intp
15%
entj
10%
entp
6%
infj
5%
enfj
3%
infp
2%
enfp
2%
estj
1%
estp
1%
istp
1%
esfp
1%
isfp
1%
isfj
0%
esfj
0%
istj
0%

intj
78%
infj
16%
intp
3%
estj
1%
infp
1%
entj
1%
entp
0%
enfp
0%
isfp
0%
enfj
0%
estp
0%
esfj
0%
istp
0%
esfp
0%
isfj
0%
istj
0%

[Daeva]

From my blog post: http://enneatude.com/2019/05/23/type-6-direction-less/
INTJ
31%
INFJ
23%
INTP
15%
INFP
12%
ENFJ
5%
ENTP
4%
ENTJ
2%
ESTJ
2%
ENFP
2%
ISTP
1%
ESTP
1%
ISFP
0%
ESFP
0%
ISTJ
0%
ISFJ
0%
ESFJ

[vermilionplum]

Input: "race consists of people who are physically similar to you, homosexuality is banging people who are physically similar to you; thus, race is literally big gay"
Result: INTJ- 85% ?????????

Other contenders:
4%- ENTJ
2%- INTP, ENFJ
1%- ENFP, ENTP, ESFP, INFJ, INFP, ESTP
0%- everything else

will go back and attempt a serious one later, probably will copy-paste longposts made in discord DMs to make the process easier

[vermilionplum]

By the way, the rawr x3 copypasta is INFP with a heavy side of ENTP

[vermilionplum]

The Navy Seals copypasta was 31% INTJ 22% INFP XD

[vermilionplum]

I put several longposts of mine through- consistently INTJ with a side of INFJ, ENTJ, and ENTP.

Next, I think I'm gonna find monologues from video games/tv shows and see if writers can emulate different types consistently at least according to this site

[a2jc4life]

This is fascinating.

[Eclipsed]

A part of a story I'm in the middle of writing:

Improvinator.

Gio, like the rest of us, was only ever looking for one thing in life. It was the very thing that entire schools of philosophy focused on. He thought about how much time those fools wasted. In the end, science found the answer. If only he could afford it. It was so expensive. He found the situation ironic.





Improvinator.

22% ENFP
15% INTP
13% INFP
13% ENFJ

[a2jc4life]

It could be particularly interesting to input text from different first-person stories by the same author and see if they show type influence of their protagonists over their author.

[[redacted]]

Well I tried it with fictional texts written from different characters' points of view, since part of the challenge with fictional writing is that I don't want all my characters to sound the same. So I wondered if this would be useful for seeing how well I capture different-

(Note: It only works well with native English speaking people)

Oh.

Well, this is what I got from an older text:
INFP
48%
ENFP
10%
ISFP
9%

More recent text (this was for NaNoWriMo lmao):
INTJ
89%
ENTP
9%
ESTJ
1%

Meanwhile, for this text I was trying to write from the point of view of a T-ish character, but seems it wasn't quite as successful. =P
ENFP
37%
INTJ
16%
ESFJ
10%

Yeah might be better to come back to this when I'm more into writing again.

[a2jc4life]

It does look like they were different. I'm heavily T-ish, personally, not everything I write shows up as T-first; it depends on the context. So I wouldn't necessarily say that last one wasn't successful. And my guess would be (although it's just that -- a guess) that a well-written first-person novel would be something of a combination of the author's type and the character's. (Dialogue excepted)

ETA: I couldn't write decent fiction if my life depended on it, but my daughter writes, so I'll see if she'll check what kind of results she gets from her stories.